Julius Randle

Minnesota Timberwolves

Position:

PF

Offensive Role:

Defensive Role:

Height:

6'7.75"

Positional Size:

B-

Weight:

250

Wingspan:

7'0"

Age:

30

Hometown:

Dallas, TX

Julius Randle Stats

Traditional
Advanced
Plus Minus

	GP	MPG	FGM-FGA	FG%	3PM-3PA	3P%	FTM-FTA	FT%	REB	APG	STL	BLK	PF	TOV	PTS
2015	1	13.6	1 - 3	0.333	0 - 0	0	0 - 2	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2
2016	81	28.2	4.4 - 10.3	0.429	0.1 - 0.4	0.278	2.4 - 3.3	0.715	10.2	1.8	0.7	0.4	3	1.8	11.3
2017	74	28.8	5.1 - 10.4	0.488	0.2 - 0.9	0.27	2.8 - 3.8	0.723	8.6	3.6	0.7	0.5	3.4	2.3	13.2
2018	82	26.7	6.1 - 11	0.558	0.1 - 0.5	0.222	3.7 - 5.2	0.718	8	2.6	0.5	0.5	3.3	2.6	16.1
2019	73	30.6	7.8 - 14.9	0.524	0.9 - 2.7	0.344	4.9 - 6.7	0.731	8.7	3.1	0.7	0.6	3.4	2.8	21.4
2020	64	32.5	7.2 - 15.7	0.46	1 - 3.6	0.277	4 - 5.5	0.733	9.7	3.1	0.8	0.3	2.8	3	19.5
2021	71	37.6	8.5 - 18.6	0.456	2.3 - 5.5	0.411	4.9 - 6	0.811	10.2	6	0.9	0.3	3.2	3.4	24.1
2022	72	35.3	7.1 - 17.3	0.411	1.7 - 5.4	0.308	4.2 - 5.6	0.756	9.9	5.1	0.7	0.5	2.8	3.4	20.1
2023	77	35.5	8.5 - 18.6	45.9	2.8 - 8.3	34.3	5.2 - 6.9	75.7	10	4.1	0.6	0.3	3	2.8	25.1
2024	46	35.4	8.6 - 18.2	47.2	1.7 - 5.3	31.1	5.1 - 6.6	78.1	9.2	5	0.5	0.3	2.7	3.5	24
2025	26	32.9 ↑	6.9 - 14.3 –	48.3 ↑	1.7 - 4.7 ↑	35.8 ↑	4.7 - 5.7 ↑	81.9 ↑	6.7 ↓	3.9 ↑	0.8 ↑	0.2 ↓	2.6 ↓	2.7 ↓	20.2 ↑
Career	667	32	6.9 - 14.7	47.1	1.2 - 3.5	33.4	4.1 - 5.4	75.1	9.3	3.7	0.7	0.4	3.1	2.8	19.1

	MP	TS%	3PAR	FTR	SQ	BOXCR	OLOAD	PR	PORT	VERS	CWARP	VORP
2015	14	25.8		66.7								0
2016	2286	48.2	4.3	32.3	49.3	1.9	27.8	2.8			-0.9	-0.7
2017	2132	54.3	8.2	36.5	57.2	3.6	33.6	5.5			-0.4	0.6
2018	2190	60.6	5	47	48	3.6	34.4	3.7			2.7	1.4
2019	2232	60	17.9	44.7	59.5	5.9	39.8	4.2			2.6	2
2020	2080	53.8	23	35	53	4.8	38.6	3.8	5.3		1.5	0.9
2021	2667	56.7	29.4	32.5	72.1	9.9	49.4	6.8	7.4	38	5.4	3.9
2022	2544	50.9	31.3	32.2	60.4	7	45.8	6	4.8	58	2	1.6
2023	2737	58.1	44.4	37.1	51.5	7.3	45.3	4.8	4.9	24	5.11	3.9
2024	1630	56.9	29.2	36.1	50.1	8.2	48.3	5	3.5	21	2.91	1.6
2025	855	60	33	39.9	55.8	6.6	40.2	5	5.8	21	1.32	0.7

Season	MP	COPM	CDPM	CPM	ODARKO	DDARKO	DARKO	ODRIP	DDRIP	DRIP	OBPM	DBPM	BPM
2015	14										-9.6	-5.6	-15.1
2016	2286	-2.1	-0.8	-2.9							-1.9	-1.3	-3.2
2017	2132	-1.1	-1.4	-2.5							-0.6	-0.3	-0.9
2018	2190	0.4	-0.1	0.3							0.6	0	0.6
2019	2232	1.4	-1.3	0.1							2.1	-0.6	1.5
2020	2080	0	-0.7	-0.7							0.7	-1	-0.3
2021	2667	0.9	0.9	1.8							2.9	0.9	3.8
2022	2544	-0.5	-0.1	-0.6	0.3	-1.1	-0.8				0.4	0.2	0.5
2023	2737	2.4	-0.9	1.5	1.8	-1.3	0.5				3.9	-0.2	3.7
2024	1630	2	-0.8	1.2	2.4	-0.3	2.1	1.6	-1.3	0.4	2.2	-0.3	1.9
2025	855	1.1 88%	-0.4 37%	0.7 75%	1	-0.3	0.7	1.5	-1.2	0.2	1.2	-0.1	1.2

Scouting Report

Stat	Value
TS%	58.8%	69
SQ	53.5	51
FTr	38.4%	90
3PAr	31.5%	29
ORB	1.1	81
cTOV	10.2%	21
Load	43.4	89
Creation	7.2	88
Portability	4.9	58
Passer Rating	5	64
CraftedOPM	1.5	91

Stat	Value
Deflections	1.2	10
raDTOV	-0.5	10
DRB	0.6	81
Rim Defense	-3.4	67
Rim Frequency	33.6	30
BLKpct	0.5	9
Versatility	21	29
rPF	0	54
CraftedDPM	-0.6	28

*hover or click any stat for a detailed description.

*This scouting report combines the player's last two seasons of performance, with greater emphasis on the most recent 855 minutes played during the 2024-25 season. Compared to all other players who played over 48 minutes.

Similar Players

Compare to Another Player

offense

	Player	Score
1	Collin Sexton	90
2	Zion Williamson	88
3	De'Aaron Fox	88
4	Ja Morant	88
5	RJ Barrett	87
6	Aaron Gordon	87
7	Scottie Barnes	87
8	Deni Avdija	86
9	Jalen Johnson	86
10	Jaylen Brown	86

defense

	Player	Score
1	Doug McDermott	86
2	RJ Barrett	83
3	Georges Niang	83
4	Miles Bridges	83
5	Sam Merrill	83
6	Nick Smith Jr.	82
7	Harrison Barnes	82
8	Tyler Herro	82
9	Jalen Wilson	82
10	Pat Connaughton	82

overall

	Player	Score
1	RJ Barrett	86
2	Jaylen Brown	84
3	Collin Sexton	83
4	Brandon Ingram	82
5	Pascal Siakam	82
6	Zion Williamson	82
7	Aaron Gordon	82
8	Trendon Watford	81
9	Cam Thomas	81
10	Ja Morant	81

*Similarity Score | The difference between the percentile scores of this player and that of all other players in his position group (guards, wings, forwards, bigs). Converted to a 1-100 scale where 100 is most similar, and 1 is least similar.