Minnesota Timberwolves
The Wolves have solid defense (8th).
Team Stats & Four Factors
Quick Stats
OFF Four Factors (Offense)
DEF Four Factors (Defense)
Last 10 Games Trend
Schedule & Results
Roster
| Player | Pos | Age | GP | MIN ↓ | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TOV | PF | CPM | OPM | DPM | WARP | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG | 24 | 61 | 35.0 | 28.8 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 9.9 | 20.2 | 48.9% | 3.4 | 8.4 | 40.5% | 5.7 | 7.2 | 79.6% | 0.6 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 1.9 | +3.7 | +4.1 | -0.5 | 6.5 | Active | |
| PF | 31 | 79 | 33.0 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 7.3 | 15.3 | 48.1% | 1.4 | 4.4 | 31.8% | 5.0 | 6.3 | 80.2% | 1.7 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 2.8 | +0.8 | +1.5 | -0.8 | 4.1 | Active | |
| SF | 25 | 73 | 31.7 | 14.8 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 5.7 | 11.1 | 51.5% | 1.4 | 3.4 | 41.2% | 2.0 | 2.4 | 83.5% | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 3.3 | +0.9 | -0.5 | +1.4 | 3.8 | Active | |
| C | 33 | 76 | 31.3 | 10.9 | 11.5 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 68.2% | 0.0 | 0.1 | - | 2.1 | 4.0 | 52.6% | 3.9 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 2.6 | +3.4 | -0.9 | +4.4 | 7.0 | Active | |
| SG | 29 | 82 | 30.4 | 12.2 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 10.2 | 40.6% | 3.0 | 7.9 | 38.0% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 74.3% | 0.8 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 | +1.6 | +0.6 | +1.0 | 5.0 | OUT | |
| SG | 26 | 69 | 27.3 | 14.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 5.6 | 10.8 | 51.7% | 1.8 | 4.1 | 43.9% | 1.8 | 2.1 | 87.6% | 0.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.9 | -1.1 | +0.1 | -1.2 | 1.2 | Active | |
| C | 26 | 77 | 26.1 | 13.6 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 11.3 | 45.6% | 2.1 | 5.8 | 36.2% | 1.2 | 1.6 | 73.2% | 1.2 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 2.5 | +1.2 | -0.1 | +1.3 | 3.6 | Active | |
| PF | 32 | 43 | 19.8 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 53.0% | 0.1 | 0.3 | 33.3% | 1.1 | 1.6 | 70.6% | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 2.2 | -0.3 | -2.0 | +1.7 | 0.9 | Active | |
| PG | 38 | 54 | 18.4 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 33.5% | 1.0 | 3.1 | 32.3% | 0.8 | 0.9 | 90.0% | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | -0.5 | -1.4 | +0.9 | 1.0 | Active | |
| PG | 25 | 71 | 16.6 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 6.6 | 45.3% | 1.6 | 4.2 | 38.1% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 78.0% | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +0.2 | 1.9 | Active | |
| SG | 24 | 68 | 13.1 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 43.4% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 33.3% | 0.6 | 1.0 | 65.7% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | -0.5 | -1.4 | +0.9 | 0.8 | Active | |
| SG | 25 | 43 | 12.5 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 45.0% | 0.7 | 1.8 | 38.9% | 1.3 | 1.6 | 80.0% | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.2 | -3.3 | -1.5 | -1.8 | -0.3 | Active | |
| C | 25 | 4 | 9.3 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 75.0% | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | -1.2 | -0.6 | -0.7 | 0.0 | Active | |
| SF | 22 | 48 | 8.9 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 42.1% | 0.4 | 1.4 | 28.6% | 0.4 | 0.5 | 78.3% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | -1.0 | -1.4 | +0.4 | 0.3 | Active | |
| C | 19 | 40 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.7 | 0.9 | 70.3% | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | -1.2 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | Active | |
| C | 19 | 5 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 62.5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.8 | 0.8 | 100.0% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | -0.7 | -0.8 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Active | |
| SF | 38 | 27 | 5.7 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 59.3% | 0.3 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | -3.8 | -3.5 | -0.3 | -0.1 | Active | |
| SG | 24 | 21 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 42.1% | 0.3 | 1.1 | 27.3% | 0.2 | 0.4 | 62.5% | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -2.3 | -0.5 | -1.8 | 0.0 | Active | |
| Team Totals | 82 | 338.5 | 161.4 | 61.1 | 35.6 | 12.3 | 9.2 | 58.4 | 119.5 | 48.9% | 18.5 | 49.1 | 37.7% | 26.5 | 34.9 | 75.9% | 15.2 | 46.0 | 18.5 | 29.8 | — | — | — | 36.2 |
G League (on assignment)
Stats for rostered Minnesota Timberwolves players who have played with the affiliate this season.
View all rostered players’ G League stats →
| Player | Age | GP | MIN | PTS ↓ | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julian Phillips | 22 | 2 | 34.7 | 29 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 13 | 24 | 54.2% | 2 | 6.5 | 30.8% | 0.5 | 3 | 16.7% | 2.5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | +23 |
| Terrence Shannon Jr. | 25 | 2 | 20.7 | 23.5 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 0.5 | 7 | 13 | 53.8% | 1.5 | 5.5 | 27.3% | 5 | 6 | 83.3% | 0.5 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | +4.5 |
| Enrique Freeman | 25 | 39 | 33.2 | 16.5 | 8.7 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 6.4 | 11.9 | 54.2% | 1.1 | 3.3 | 32.6% | 1.5 | 2.1 | 72.8% | 2.8 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 2.8 | +4.6 |
| Rocco Zikarsky | 19 | 42 | 25.1 | 14.8 | 8.9 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 10.8 | 53.2% | 0.8 | 2.5 | 30.8% | 1.5 | 2 | 75.6% | 2.4 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 2.2 | +4.6 |
| Joan Beringer | 19 | 11 | 29.5 | 14.6 | 10.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 6.3 | 10.3 | 61.1% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1.1 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 5.2 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 2.3 | +4.7 |
Lineup Analysis
Stabilized Net Rating — All ratings below blend raw on-court results with expected performance (based on team strength and player impact) to reduce noise from small samples. The more minutes a group plays together, the more we trust the raw numbers.
Best groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Worst groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Actual Lineups - Top 5-man combinations by minutes played this season, with real offensive/defensive ratings. Net shown is Stabilized (see above). Min cutoff: 75+ min. Does not include players with limited or no minutes (e.g. injured, recent trades). View all lineups →
Talent Breakdown
Player tiers based on CraftedPM impact metrics
The Minnesota Timberwolves feature an elite anchor in Anthony Edwards. Their depth is solid with 8 rotation-caliber players.
Team Identity & Analysis
Key Players
Elite offensive engine with strong shooting and high portability across systems. Strong positive impact.
Dominant rebounder with elite defense. Strong positive impact.
Strong shooter with strong defense. Solid rotation piece.
Strong shooter with strong defense and high portability across systems. Solid rotation piece.
Strong offensive contributor with solid rebounding. Solid rotation piece.
Offensive Identity
The Minnesota Timberwolves maintain a solid offense, ranking around the middle of the league. They shoot the ball efficiently, ranking above the league average in shooting and are proficient at drawing fouls.
Defensive Identity
The Wolves have a strong defensive presence, placing them in the top 10 defensively. They excel at contesting shots and limiting opponents' scoring opportunities and frequently send opponents to the free throw line.