Milwaukee Bucks
The Bucks .
Team Stats & Four Factors
Quick Stats
OFF Four Factors (Offense)
DEF Four Factors (Defense)
Last 10 Games Trend
Schedule & Results
Roster
| Player | Pos | Age | GP | MIN ↓ | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TOV | PF | CPM | OPM | DPM | WARP | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG | 25 | 38 | 33.2 | 17.4 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 6.3 | 13.5 | 46.5% | 1.2 | 3.8 | 31.6% | 3.6 | 4.1 | 87.8% | 0.9 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 2.3 | +1.6 | +0.4 | +1.1 | 2.5 | DAY | |
| PG | 23 | 74 | 32.1 | 17.3 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 6.6 | 13.9 | 47.2% | 2.5 | 6.1 | 41.0% | 1.7 | 2.1 | 79.6% | 0.7 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 | +0.9 | +0.5 | +0.5 | 4.0 | DAY | |
| SG | 26 | 33 | 31.3 | 20.5 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 7.5 | 15.6 | 48.0% | 2.5 | 6.7 | 37.3% | 3.0 | 3.3 | 91.7% | 0.4 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 1.9 | +0.5 | +1.8 | -1.3 | 1.5 | Active | |
| SG | 26 | 78 | 29.1 | 10.4 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 7.9 | 42.4% | 3.0 | 7.1 | 42.3% | 0.7 | 0.8 | 85.5% | 0.4 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 2.3 | -0.4 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 2.2 | Active | |
| SF | 24 | 75 | 28.3 | 15.4 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 6.2 | 12.2 | 50.7% | 0.8 | 2.4 | 33.3% | 2.2 | 2.9 | 76.9% | 1.3 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | -1.0 | -0.3 | -0.7 | 1.5 | Active | |
| C | 29 | 71 | 26.9 | 11.9 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 9.1 | 44.0% | 2.1 | 5.4 | 38.9% | 1.8 | 2.5 | 74.0% | 1.1 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 2.6 | +0.4 | -0.8 | +1.2 | 2.7 | DAY | |
| PF | 30 | 69 | 26.2 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 10.0 | 49.2% | 1.2 | 3.5 | 34.3% | 2.0 | 2.7 | 72.6% | 0.8 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | -3.2 | -1.7 | -1.5 | -0.8 | DAY | |
| SF | 31 | 26 | 23.5 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 45.0% | 2.3 | 5.4 | 42.6% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 100.0% | 0.2 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -2.1 | -1.2 | -0.9 | 0.1 | Active | |
| C | 21 | 77 | 22.1 | 11.1 | 9.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 8.4 | 53.0% | 1.2 | 3.0 | 40.0% | 0.9 | 1.2 | 74.0% | 2.8 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | +0.3 | +0.1 | +0.2 | 2.3 | Active | |
| SG | 27 | 65 | 21.2 | 8.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 7.3 | 38.7% | 1.9 | 5.3 | 35.8% | 0.6 | 0.8 | 76.9% | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.3 | -3.4 | -1.1 | -2.3 | -0.8 | Active | |
| SG | 24 | 42 | 21.0 | 13.5 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 4.5 | 11.0 | 41.0% | 1.2 | 4.0 | 30.0% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 81.1% | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | -3.0 | +0.6 | -3.7 | -0.3 | Active | |
| C | 27 | 67 | 19.7 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 78.4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.7 | 1.1 | 62.0% | 2.2 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 2.2 | -3.4 | -2.9 | -0.6 | -0.7 | Active | |
| SF | 22 | 57 | 19.3 | 7.6 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 42.2% | 1.1 | 3.2 | 34.4% | 0.6 | 0.8 | 71.1% | 0.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 | -2.3 | -1.5 | -0.7 | 0.1 | Active | |
| PG | 19 | 53 | 17.8 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 42.9% | 1.2 | 2.9 | 41.4% | 1.1 | 1.2 | 87.9% | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.9 | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 0.8 | Active | |
| PF | 25 | 47 | 15.7 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 51.5% | 1.1 | 2.5 | 44.0% | 0.1 | 0.2 | 36.4% | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | -1.8 | -1.3 | -0.5 | 0.2 | DAY | |
| SG | 31 | 48 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 44.2% | 0.6 | 1.4 | 42.9% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 88.9% | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.1 | -1.7 | -2.5 | +0.7 | 0.2 | DAY | |
| SF | 24 | 48 | 8.5 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 32.8% | 0.3 | 1.3 | 23.1% | 0.4 | 0.7 | 62.5% | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | -2.1 | -2.2 | +0.1 | 0.1 | Active | |
| PF | 31 | 27 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 32.6% | 0.1 | 0.6 | 16.7% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 50.0% | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | -1.2 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | Active | |
| PF | 33 | 34 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 46.9% | 0.0 | 0.1 | - | 0.5 | 0.9 | 56.7% | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | -1.3 | -2.8 | +1.4 | 0.1 | Active | |
| PG | 23 | 7 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 46.2% | 0.6 | 1.1 | 54.5% | 0.9 | 1.1 | 75.0% | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | Active | |
| Team Totals | 78 | 405.0 | 182.9 | 66.1 | 44.8 | 12.4 | 6.7 | 66.8 | 143.8 | 46.5% | 24.9 | 65.8 | 37.8% | 24.6 | 30.9 | 79.6% | 14.8 | 51.2 | 23.9 | 31.5 | — | — | — | 15.7 |
G League (on assignment)
Stats for rostered Milwaukee Bucks players who have played with the affiliate this season.
View all rostered players’ G League stats →
| Player | Age | GP | MIN | PTS ↓ | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Nance | 26 | 13 | 34.6 | 20.8 | 8 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 1 | 8 | 14.2 | 56.5% | 2.5 | 5.8 | 42.7% | 1.4 | 1.7 | 81.8% | 1.2 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 2.6 | +3 |
| Kasparas Jakučionis | 20 | 8 | 26.8 | 16.6 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 5.3 | 12.5 | 42.0% | 1.8 | 5.4 | 32.6% | 2.6 | 3.3 | 80.8% | 1.8 | 4 | 3.1 | 2.4 | -2.6 |
Lineup Analysis
Stabilized Net Rating — All ratings below blend raw on-court results with expected performance (based on team strength and player impact) to reduce noise from small samples. The more minutes a group plays together, the more we trust the raw numbers.
Best groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Worst groups(2–4 man, 200+ min)
Actual Lineups - Top 5-man combinations by minutes played this season, with real offensive/defensive ratings. Net shown is Stabilized (see above). Min cutoff: 75+ min. Does not include players with limited or no minutes (e.g. injured, recent trades). View all lineups →
Talent Breakdown
Player tiers based on CraftedPM impact metrics
The Milwaukee Bucks lack star power at the top of the roster. Their depth is solid with 8 rotation-caliber players.
Team Identity & Analysis
Key Players
Strong playmaker with strong defense. Solid rotation piece.
Strong shooter. Solid rotation piece.
Strong offensive contributor with elite shooting and high portability across systems. Solid rotation piece.
Elite shooter with high portability across systems
Solid rebounder with strong defense. Solid rotation piece.
Offensive Identity
The Milwaukee Bucks struggle offensively, falling below the league average in scoring. They are exceptionally accurate shooters, converting at an elite rate from the field and struggle to get to the free throw line. Turnovers remain a concern, often giving away possessions.
Defensive Identity
The Bucks have significant challenges on defense, ranking among the bottom 5 teams. They struggle to contest shots effectively, allowing higher shooting percentages.